Science Communication for Public Good

Communicating science for public good is more important than ever, but it can be a tricky undertaking. Scientists who get involved in public controversies may find themselves subject to criticism and labeled as biased. This panel session brings together scientist-communicators, science journalists, and media producers to probe provocative questions: How and when should scientists “cross the line” from being dispassionate investigators to committed advocates for an evidence-supported cause? How can scientists effectively engage with public audiences by being relevant without oversimplifying or overstating scientific evidence?