- Visitors will be aware of science research applicable to varied views on the provocative question.
- Visitors will be aware of the different kinds of evidence that are frequently part of discussions of socio-scientific issues: scientific evidence, informal evidence based on personal experience, and societal values.
- Visitors will understand that one’s social values can influence one’s interpretation of scientific evidence as well as one’s position with regard to a socio-scientific question.
- Visitors will be aware that social decisions impact individuals differently because of their varied biological and environmental circumstances.
- Visitors will practice socio-scientific argumentation skills, which include:
- Discriminating between scientific evidence, personal experience/knowledge, and values,
- Exploring the values underlying different viewpoints,
- Reflecting critically about evidence from scientific research,
- Recognizing potential counterarguments to a given argument,
- Justifying one’s position by using informal and scientific evidence with one’s values and worldviews, and
- Integrating scientific knowledge into arguments of socio-scientific issues.
- Visitors will come to see themselves as someone who can contribute to and participate in discussions of socio-scientific issues.
While formative evaluation was used to improve individual components under development, area testing research was conducted after development on the components as a group. The purpose of this research was to understand whether visitors will engage in socio-scientific argumentation in an un-facilitated exhibit space and how the exhibits will impact their socio-scientific argumentation skills.
This presentation will discuss findings from the area testing research including what visitors learned through their experiences, how the exhibit impacted visitors’ socio-scientific argumentation skills, and whether interacting with the exhibit impacted visitors’ confidence in their abilities to participate in socio-scientific discussions. Additionally, the presentation will describe how, if at all, the evidence and claims visitors used led to differences in their arguments.