The research provides examples and imagery that illustrates benefits, risks, and ethical dilemmas in attempting to visualize climate change impacts as well as mitigation and adaptation measures. Qualitative and quantitative case study evaluations through questionnaires, observations, and interviews provided new research results on the effectiveness of future visualizations within participatory processes in co-producing knowledge, increasing awareness, and stimulating policy change. The findings suggest that especially experiential 3D landscape visualisations can have powerful impacts on awareness and understanding of local climate change impacts. Interactive visualization tools such as Virtual Globes facilitated dialogue across multiple disciplines and stakeholders. It seems crucial to embed these powerful tools in a mediated process to avoid bias or misinterpretation. Such a local climate change visioning process can then inform capacity building, mitigation and adaptation projects, operational changes, and even local policies as a longitudinal study demonstrated. These results argue for strengthening an emerging network of Decision Theatres around the world that could function as sustainability hubs and centres of learning about visualization and other participatory tools at the interface of climate change science and society. Organizations such as AAAS might consider a role in fostering a richer and more compelling dialogue about climate change futures by encouraging the systematic testing and use of visual media, and even arbitrating the ethical use of visualization by scientists and other users.
See more of: Communication
See more of: Symposia