This is both blessing and bane for without the ocean sink for both heat and CO2 we would already face a climate crisis of epic proportions. But with the relentless uptake of CO2 we are significantly changing ocean pH and ocean acidification is now widely recognized as an environmental challenge. But how large a challenge? And how may we scale this against the desire to use the sub-sea oceanic reservoirs for industrial storage of captured CO2 with possible leakage, or even direct ocean injection.
The primary obstacle to CO2 capture and disposal is cost, now about $65-70 per ton CO2. The secondary obstacle is the legal status and penalties associated with environmental harm and/or leakage from a site. Objectively any environmental harm from leakage or disposal would be small and local compared to the massive invasion from above. For example if we were to take 1% of the oceanic uptake today as a target for direct oceanic storage of captured CO2 this would be ~10,000 tons per hour, or a 50,000 ton tanker or pipeline fill every five hours. Such numbers would strain industrial capacity and likely provoke both economic and environmental backlash. Yet 99% of CO2 entering the ocean would still be via the unregulated surface uptake.
It is thus very likely that oceanic CO2 levels will continue to increase, that pH will continue to decline, and that a largely unspoken world dependence on CO2 absorption by the ocean will continue. The impacts of this are under intensive investigation. There is little doubt that the decline in pH will impact shell formation in calcareous organisms and coral reefs, but new results suggest that the greater harm to the vast majority of marine life lies in ocean warming and declining O2, and that direct CO2 impacts are secondary.
See more of: Environment
See more of: Symposia